<div id="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
document.querySelector('.foo')
document.querySelector('#foo')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
class | |
id |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
class | 1851918.1 Ops/sec |
id | 1395311.1 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the provided JavaScript microbenchmark.
Overview of the Benchmark
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two methods of selecting elements in an HTML document using the querySelector
method: one that uses class selectors (class
) and another that uses ID selectors (id
).
Options Compared
There are only two options being compared:
class
): This option uses the querySelector
method with a dot (.) followed by the class name to select an element.id
): This option uses the querySelector
method with a hash (#) followed by the ID to select an element.Pros and Cons
Both approaches have their trade-offs:
class
):id
):Other Considerations
The benchmark does not consider other factors that may affect performance, such as:
Library and Features Used
There is no library being used in this benchmark. However, the querySelector
method is a built-in JavaScript method for selecting elements based on their attribute values.
The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax. It simply uses standard HTML elements with class and ID attributes to define the selection targets.
Alternative Benchmarks
If you want to compare different methods of selecting elements, here are some alternative benchmarks:
getElementsByTagName()
instead of querySelector
Keep in mind that each benchmark should be designed to test specific use cases and assumptions about your application's requirements.
I hope this explanation helps!