<div class="test"></div>
document.querySelector('.test').className;
document.getElementsByClassName('test')[0].className;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelector | |
getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelector | 2459318.5 Ops/sec |
getElementsByClassName | 2297260.5 Ops/sec |
What is tested: MeasureThat.net tests the performance difference between two approaches to dynamically retrieve elements from an HTML document:
document.querySelector('.test')
(using the querySelector
method)document.getElementsByClassName('test')[0].className
(using the getElementsByClassName
method)These methods are used to select DOM elements based on their class names.
Options compared: The benchmark compares two options:
querySelector
: A modern, efficient way to select elements by CSS selector.getElementsByClassName
: An older method that returns an array of elements with the specified class name.Pros and Cons:
querySelector
:querySelector
getElementsByClassName
:*=x
syntax)querySelector
Library usage: None of the test cases explicitly uses any JavaScript libraries. However, MeasureThat.net is likely using a library or framework to manage the benchmarking process.
Special JS features/syntax: There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark definition.
Other alternatives: If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for selecting elements from the DOM, here are a few options:
querySelectorAll
: Similar to querySelector
, but returns all matching elements instead of just one.document.getElementsByTagName
: Returns an array of all elements with the specified tag name.DOMQuery
libraries: There are several third-party libraries that provide more advanced and flexible DOM querying capabilities, such as jQuery or Sizzle.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have their own performance characteristics and trade-offs, so it's essential to evaluate them based on your specific use case and requirements.