var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = { a: 2, params };
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.assign | |
spread operator | |
Object.assign 2 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.assign | 4247709.5 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 15121996.0 Ops/sec |
Object.assign 2 | 4310944.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the provided benchmarking data.
Benchmark Description
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: using the spread operator (...
) and Object.assign()
to merge an object with another object.
Options Compared
The benchmark tests three variations:
...
): This approach uses the spread operator to create a new object by copying properties from params
into the existing object { a: 2 }
.Object.assign()
: This approach uses the Object.assign()
method to merge the two objects.Object.assign()
(again): This is another variation of using Object.assign()
, likely intended for comparison with the first variant.Pros and Cons
...
):Object.assign()
:Library Usage
None of the benchmarking tests explicitly use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that Object.assign()
is a built-in method in modern JavaScript environments.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two simple approaches to object merging.
Other Alternatives
If you were to modify this benchmark or create an alternative, you might consider other approaches, such as:
Object.create()
or a similar method to create a new object....
) with Object.assign()
.These alternatives would require changes to the benchmark definition and test cases.