Benchmark: math pow vs multiplysadfasdfkjlkj

Tests:

pow
var x = Math.pow(54,3);
mult
var y = 54*54*54
op
var z = 54 ** 3

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
pow
mult
op

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 107 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
pow	8205079.5 Ops/sec
mult	714749952.0 Ops/sec
op	714739584.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros and cons of each approach.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is comparing three different ways to calculate `54 * 54 * 54` in JavaScript:

1. Using the traditional multiplication operator (`*`)
2. Using the exponentiation operator (`**`) with a twist (more on this later)
3. Using the `Math.pow()` method

**Library and Special JS Feature**

The benchmark uses the `Math` library, which provides various mathematical functions, including `pow()`, `multiply()`, and others.

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the exponentiation operator (`**`) was introduced in ECMAScript 2016 (ES6) as a shorthand for raising a number to a power.

**Options Comparison**

The three options are compared in terms of their execution speed:

1. `Math.pow()`: This method takes two arguments, the base and the exponent. In this case, the base is `54` and the exponent is `3`.
2. Traditional multiplication: Simply multiplying `54` by itself three times (`54 * 54 * 54`).
3. Exponentiation operator (`**`): This operator raises the first argument to the power of the second argument. In this case, it's raising `54` to the power of `3`.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Math.pow()**: Pros:
	* Well-documented and widely supported.
	* Provides a simple way to calculate powers without having to use multiplication or division.
Cons:
	* May be slower than traditional multiplication due to the overhead of calling a method.
2. Traditional multiplication: Pros:
	* Fastest of the three options, since it only involves simple arithmetic operations.
Cons:
	* Requires manual implementation of exponentiation logic, which can be error-prone.
3. Exponentiation operator (`**`): Pros:
	* Concise and expressive syntax, making it easier to read and write code.
Cons:
	* Introduced in ES6, so may not work in older browsers or environments.

**Other Considerations**

The benchmark also takes into account the device platform (Desktop), operating system (Linux), and browser (Chrome 107) used to run each test. This allows for a more accurate representation of real-world performance under specific conditions.

**Alternatives**

If you wanted to compare these options in a different context, here are some alternatives:

* You could use different programming languages or environments, such as Node.js or Python.
* You could add additional variations, such as using a different base or exponent value.
* You could compare the performance of other mathematical functions, such as `Math.sqrt()` or `Math.sin()`.

Related benchmarks:

math pow vs multiplysadfasdfkjlkj (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: pow vs mult vs op

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

pow

mult

op

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):