var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = Object.assign({ a: 2 }, params);
var params = { b:"hello", c: true, d:7 };
var other = { a: 2, params };
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.assign | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.assign | 3581822.8 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 1990625.6 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results in detail.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case created on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using Object.assign()
versus the spread operator (...
).
Approaches Compared
Pros and Cons
Object.assign():
Pros:
Cons:
Spread Operator:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Special Features
In this benchmark, the Object.assign()
method is used to assign properties from an object (params
) to another object (other
). The spread operator is used to expand the params
object into individual elements and assign them to other
.
There are no special features or syntaxes involved in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
The benchmark uses a specific test case that creates two objects, params
and other
, where params
contains several properties (b: "hello"
, c: true
, d: 7
) to be assigned to other
. The number of executions per second is reported for each test name.
Benchmark Results
The latest benchmark result shows the performance metrics for both approaches:
Test Name | Executions Per Second |
---|---|
Object.assign | 3581822.75 |
Spread Operator | 1990625.625 |
In this case, the spread operator outperforms Object.assign()
by approximately 80%. However, please note that these results may vary depending on the specific environment and browser used.
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or testing other JavaScript features, here are some options:
These alternatives can provide more comprehensive testing options or help you explore other aspects of JavaScript performance optimization.