var fooSet = new Set();
for(var i=0;i<10000;i++) {
fooSet.add(i);
}
var other = Array.from(fooSet);
var fooSet = new Set();
for(var i=0;i<10000;i++) {
fooSet.add(i);
}
var other = [fooSet];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.from | |
Spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.from | 3868.7 Ops/sec |
Spread | 3934.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is testing two approaches to convert a Set object to an Array: Array.from
and using the spread operator (...
). The test case uses 10,000 elements.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
...
): This operator can be used to convert a Set to an array by spreading its elements into a new array.Pros and Cons
...
): Pros:Array.from
.Library and Purpose
None of the test cases explicitly use a library, but they do rely on built-in JavaScript features:
Set
: A data structure that stores unique values.Array.from()
: A method that converts an iterable to an array....
): A feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows elements to be spread into a new array or object.Special JS Feature
The test case uses the spread operator, which is a special JavaScript feature. However, since it's already part of the standard library since ES6, no additional explanation is needed.
Other Alternatives
There are other ways to convert Sets to arrays, such as using Array.prototype.slice()
or creating a custom function. However, these approaches may not be as efficient or readable as Array.from
or the spread operator.
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here's an example of using Array.prototype.slice()
:
var fooSet = new Set();
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
fooSet.add(i);
}
var other = Array.prototype.slice.call(fooSet);
Keep in mind that this approach may have performance implications due to the overhead of calling slice()
on an array.