var n = 0;
while(true) {
n++;
if(n=='100000')
break;
}
var n = 0;
while(true) {
n++;
if(n===100000)
break;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
test equality with coercion | |
test strict equality |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
test equality with coercion | 668.6 Ops/sec |
test strict equality | 9416.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is checking which equals operator (==
vs ===
) is faster, considering type coercion. The question seems to imply that using ===
instead of ==
can provide a performance benefit due to its more precise comparison. However, in modern JavaScript, the difference between these two operators is often negligible.
Options being compared
There are two options being compared:
==
)===
)Pros and Cons of each approach:
==
):===
):Library used:
In the provided test case, a while
loop is used to increment a variable (n
) until it reaches 100,000. No external libraries are mentioned.
Special JS feature or syntax:
None of the provided code uses any special JavaScript features or syntax (e.g., async/await, arrow functions, ES6 classes).
Other considerations:
Keep in mind that this benchmark only tests the performance difference between ==
and ===
operators. In real-world scenarios, it's often better to prioritize code readability and maintainability over minor performance optimizations.
Alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative approaches or want to explore other optimization techniques:
===
operator with a type guard (e.g., checking if n
is an integer before comparing it to 100,000).In conclusion, this benchmark provides insight into the performance difference between ==
and ===
operators in JavaScript. However, for most use cases, the benefits of strict equality (===
) outweigh any potential performance gains from using coercion (==
).