Benchmark: R vs _ uniq - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

  var data = [..._.range(1000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  }),..._.range(1000).map(function(i) {
    return {
      counter: i
    }
  })];

Tests:

Lodash
var result = _.uniq(data);
Ramda
var result = R.uniq(data);
Set
function* unique(xs) { const seen = new Set(); for (const x of xs) { if (seen.has(x)) continue; seen.add(x); yield x; } } var result = [...unique(data)];

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Ramda
Set

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/95.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 95 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	6157.9 Ops/sec
Ramda	0.7 Ops/sec
Set	2347.5 Ops/sec

R vs _ uniq (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Ramda vs Set

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Ramda

Set

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A