<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.26.1/ramda.min.js"></script>
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7]
R.uniq(arr);
_.uniq(arr);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Ramda uniq | |
Lodash uniq |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Ramda uniq | 270347.2 Ops/sec |
Lodash uniq | 3033875.8 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark for you.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two functions: _.uniq(arr)
from Lodash and R.uniq(arr)
from Ramda. The script preparation code initializes an array arr
with 14 elements, all of which are equal to 7. This is done to test both functions' performance when removing duplicates.
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Both functions have similar functionality, but there are some differences in their implementation:
R.uniq()
might be slightly faster due to its functional programming style and use of memoization. Lodash's implementation is more imperative and uses a simple algorithm to remove duplicates.R.uniq()
might be considered more concise due to its use of higher-order functions.Library Descriptions
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. Both Lodash and Ramda use standard JavaScript features like function declarations and arrow functions.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in alternative approaches for removing duplicates, here are some other options:
Set
data structure: You can use the Set
object to remove duplicates from an array by converting it to a set and then back to an array.Array.unique()
function: This function provides a similar functionality to Lodash's _.uniq() but is part of Google's Closure Library.Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics, readability, or maintainability compared to the benchmarked functions.