<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js'></script>
var value = [{a: 30310}, {b: 100303}, {c: 3040494}, {d: 6542321}, {e: 13123531}]
_.forEach(value, function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
value.forEach(function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash forEach | |
Native foreach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash forEach | 26496.7 Ops/sec |
Native foreach | 29311.4 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, library usage, special JavaScript features, and alternatives.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two approaches for iterating over an array:
forEach
: A function from the Lodash library that applies a provided function to each element in an array.forEach
: The built-in Array.prototype.forEach() method in JavaScript, which also applies a provided function to each element in an array.Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
forEach
implementationforEach
implementation (built-in)Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Lodash forEach
Pros:
Cons:
Native forEach
Pros:
Cons:
**Library Usage: Lodash`
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks, such as array manipulation, string formatting, and object creation. In this benchmark, the forEach
function is being compared to the native implementation.
Special JavaScript Features
None mentioned in the provided code snippet. However, if you're interested in exploring other special features, consider:
Alternative Implementations
Other alternatives to Lodash's forEach
or native JavaScript's forEach
could include:
Keep in mind that the performance difference between these alternatives is usually negligible unless you're dealing with extremely large datasets or specific use cases where one implementation is significantly optimized for your needs.
I hope this explanation helps!