<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js'></script>
var value = [{a: 30310}, {b: 100303}, {c: 3040494}, {d: 6542321}, {e: 13123531}]
_.forEach(value, function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
value.forEach(function(v,i) {console.log(v)})
for (let i = 0; i < value.length; i++) {
console.log(value[i]);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash | |
native | |
for loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash | 69180.9 Ops/sec |
native | 76566.4 Ops/sec |
for loop | 82267.8 Ops/sec |
Overview of the Benchmark
The provided benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different approaches in JavaScript: Lodash's forEach
function, native foreach
loop, and native for
loop.
Options Compared
The benchmark tests the execution speed of each approach on a predefined array of objects (value
) with five elements. The three options being compared are:
forEach
function: This is a utility function provided by the Lodash library that iterates over an array and executes a callback function for each element.foreach
loop: This is a built-in JavaScript method that allows iterating over an array using a traditional for
loop syntax.for
loop: This is another built-in JavaScript construct that allows looping through an array using a traditional for
loop syntax.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
forEach
function:foreach
loop:for
loop:Library Used
The Lodash library is used in the benchmark, specifically version 4.17.10. Lodash provides a wide range of utility functions that can simplify code writing and improve performance.
Special JS Feature or Syntax (Not Applicable)
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for iterating over arrays in JavaScript include:
Array.prototype.forEach()
: This is a built-in method of the Array prototype that allows iterating over an array using a callback function.Array.prototype.map()
and Array.prototype.filter()
: These methods can be used to transform or filter arrays, but may not be suitable for all use cases.In summary, this benchmark provides a useful comparison between three different approaches to iterating over arrays in JavaScript, highlighting the trade-offs between conciseness, performance, and control.