<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
var arr = [];
_.isEmpty(arr);
arr.length === 0;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | |
Array.length |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | 4206416.0 Ops/sec |
Array.length | 16173378.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark.
Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests two different approaches for checking if an array is empty: using the _.isEmpty()
function from the Lodash library and the built-in Array.length
property.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
length
property on it and then comparing it to 0 using the ===
operator.Pros and Cons
Array.length
. It also handles edge cases like null or undefined arrays.Library Usage
The Lodash library is used in this benchmark to provide the _.isEmpty()
function. The library helps simplify the code and makes it more expressive, but it does add an extra dependency.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. It only uses standard JavaScript constructs like arrays and functions.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to compare other approaches for checking if an array is empty, some alternatives could be:
for...of
loop with a counter variable.arr.length === 0 && arr[0] === undefined
).However, these alternatives might not be as efficient or readable as the approaches tested in this benchmark.