<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
window.arr = [];
_.isEmpty(window.arr);
window.arr.length === 0;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | |
Array.length |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | 6106111.5 Ops/sec |
Array.length | 13437975.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches:
_.isEmpty(window.arr)
using the Lodash librarywindow.arr.length === 0
(i.e., checking if an empty array has a length of 0)In essence, the benchmark tests which approach is faster and more efficient.
Options compared:
The two options being compared are:
_.isEmpty
) to check if an object is emptylength
property of an arrayPros and cons:
However, there are also some cons:
* The custom implementation may not be as readable or maintainable, especially for those unfamiliar with arrays.
Other considerations:
The benchmark's focus on performance makes it relevant for applications that require fast data processing or need to optimize for response times. However, in many cases, readability and maintainability are equally important considerations.
In general, developers should choose the approach that best fits their project's specific needs and constraints.
Special JavaScript features or syntax:
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two approaches to check if an array is empty.
As for other alternatives, there are many other libraries and functions available that can be used to check if an object or array is empty, such as Array.isArray()
or a custom implementation using the every()
method. However, these alternatives are not being tested in this specific benchmark.