array = new Array(100)
result = array.reduce( (acc, item) => ({acc,[item]: item}), {})
result = array.reduce( (acc, item) => {
obj = {};
obj[item] = item;
return obj
}, {})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
reduce | |
reduce without |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
reduce | 2986562.5 Ops/sec |
reduce without | 2993818.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which outlines the rules for testing JavaScript code. Here's what's tested:
array = new Array(100)
).reduce
: Tests the Array.prototype.reduce()
method, which reduces an array to a single value by iteratively applying a function to each element and accumulating a result.reduce without
: A variation of the previous test case where the accumulator object (acc
) is not initialized with {}
. Instead, an empty object (obj = {}
) is created inside the callback function.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two approaches:
Array.prototype.reduce()
method: The original implementation uses an accumulator object ({...acc,[item]: item}
) to store the reduced values.obj = {}
) inside the callback function, which is then used as the accumulator.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach:
Array.prototype.reduce()
method:
Pros:
Cons:
Variation without initializing accumulator:
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
In general, the choice between these two approaches depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. If readability and maintainability are more important than absolute performance, the original reduce()
method might be preferred.
Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark. However, the Array.prototype.reduce()
method relies on the native JavaScript Array prototype.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these test cases. The focus is solely on measuring the performance of the reduce()
method and its variations.
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, consider the following options:
Array.prototype.reduce()
, you could implement your own reduction function using a loop or recursion.reduce()
method, which can be used as an alternative to the native JavaScript version.