var array = Array.from(Array(1000000).keys());
let newArr = array.reduce((acc, cur) => {acc.push(cur); return acc;}, [])
var array = Array.from(Array(1000000).keys());
let newArr = [];
array.forEach(x => newArr.push(x))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Reduce | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Reduce | 30.6 Ops/sec |
Push | 30.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definitions and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition:
The test measures the performance difference between using reduce()
and creating a new array by pushing elements into it.
Options Compared:
There are two main approaches being compared:
Array.from()
and then uses the forEach()
method to iterate over the original array, pushing elements into the new array.Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
Other Considerations:
Library Usage:
The benchmark doesn't explicitly use any external libraries. However, it does rely on JavaScript's built-in Array.from()
method and the forEach()
method, which are part of the ECMAScript standard.
Special JS Features or Syntax:
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these benchmarks that would impact their interpretation for developers without deep knowledge of JavaScript. The use of ES6+ features like Array.from()
and reduce()
is widely adopted and should be familiar to most modern JavaScript developers.
Alternatives:
Other alternatives for creating a new array while pushing elements into it include:
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { newArr.push(arr[i]); }
newArr = arr.map(x => x);
(Note: This creates a new array, similar to Array.from()
, but with more flexibility in mapping elements.)_.times(1000000, (_, i) => { newArr.push(i); });
These alternatives have different trade-offs in terms of performance, memory usage, and code readability, which should be considered when choosing an approach for specific use cases.