let operation = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10];
for (let i=0; i<operation.length; i++) {
console.log(operation[i]);
}
let operation = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10];
for(let value of operation) {
console.log(value);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
For loop | |
For...of loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
For loop | 47086.0 Ops/sec |
For...of loop | 45340.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance difference between using traditional for
loops and for...of
loops in JavaScript for iterating over an array.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
for
loop that uses a counter variable (i
) to iterate over the array indices....
) or the for...of
syntax to iterate directly over the elements of an array.Pros and Cons
Library
None in this case, but if we were to extend this benchmark, we might consider comparing performance with different array implementations (e.g., Array.from()
, Array.prototype.slice()
, etc.).
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark uses the spread operator (...
) in the For-of Loop
variant, which is a modern JavaScript feature that allows iterable objects to be expanded into arrays.
Other Considerations
When choosing between traditional for
loops and for-of
loops, consider the trade-off between control and performance. If you need more fine-grained control over iteration or work with legacy codebases, a traditional for
loop might be preferable. However, if speed is critical, the more concise and efficient for-of
loop is likely a better choice.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for iterating over arrays include:
For more complex iteration scenarios, consider using techniques like:
Keep in mind that each approach has its own trade-offs, and the best choice depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.