<div id="testdiv">
<div id="unique1" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="1">test1</div>
<div id="unique2" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="2">test2</div>
<div id="unique3" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="3">test3</div>
<div id="unique4" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="4">test4</div>
<div id="unique5" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="5">test5</div>
</div>
var i, imax;
var doc = document;
var test = doc.getElementById('testdiv').childNodes[0].innerHTML;
var test = doc.querySelector('#testdiv .unique').innerHTML;
var test = doc.getElementById('testdiv').getElementsByClassName('unique')[0].innerHTML;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementById | |
querySelector | |
getElementById and getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementById | 4348930.0 Ops/sec |
querySelector | 1997115.4 Ops/sec |
getElementById and getElementsByClassName | 2193855.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The test measures the performance of three different approaches to retrieve the inner HTML of a specific DOM element:
getElementById
getElementById
with getElementsByClassName
(combined)querySelector
These tests are designed to measure the speed difference between these three approaches in retrieving a single, unique DOM element.
Options Compared
getElementById
: uses the document.getElementById()
method to retrieve an element by its ID.getElementById and getElementsByClassName
: combines document.getElementById()
with getElementsByClassName()
to retrieve an element by both its ID and class name.querySelector
: uses the document.querySelector()
method to select an element based on a CSS selector.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
getElementById
:getElementById and getElementsByClassName
: getElementById
alone due to the additional method call and array iteration.querySelector
:Library Used
None explicitly mentioned in the provided code. However, it's likely that the tests are using built-in JavaScript libraries or DOM APIs to interact with the HTML document.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There doesn't seem to be any special JS feature or syntax used in this benchmark (e.g., ES6+ features like async/await, arrow functions). The code appears to use traditional JavaScript methods and syntax.
Other Alternatives
If you need to retrieve an element by ID or class name, other approaches might include:
querySelectorAll()
for retrieving multiple elements that match a CSS selectorKeep in mind that this benchmark is focused on measuring the performance of specific methods, not exploring alternative approaches.
If you have any further questions or would like more information on these topics, feel free to ask!