<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
window.foo = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
window.bar = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
window.foo.toString() === window.bar.toString();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEqual | |
Array.toString() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEqual | 1202357.5 Ops/sec |
Array.toString() | 1245165.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its results.
Benchmark Purpose: The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to check for equality between two arrays of strings:
lodash.isEqual
(a utility function from the Lodash library)===
operator on string values converted to strings using toString()
methodOptions Compared:
toString()
method and then compares these string representations using ===
operator.Pros and Cons:
Library:
The lodash
library is a collection of reusable JavaScript functions that provide utility functionality for tasks such as:
_.map()
, _.filter()
)._string.prototype.capitalize()
)._object.prototype.get()
, _object.prototype.set()
).In this benchmark, lodash.isEqual
is used to compare the equality of two arrays.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. It only relies on standard JavaScript language constructs and libraries (Lodash in this case).
Other Alternatives:
Set
data structure to compare arrays for equality.isEqual
, other alternatives could be used, such as:In conclusion, the benchmark compares two approaches to check for equality between arrays of strings: using a utility function from Lodash (lodash.isEqual
) and a simple array comparison using toString()
method. The choice between these approaches depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as performance, library inclusion, or complexity handling.