<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
window.foo = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
window.bar = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
Object.values(window.foo);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEqual | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEqual | 1119141.1 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 1757460.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the JavaScript benchmark using MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches to check for equality between two shallow arrays of strings: lodash.isEqual
and JSON.stringify
. The test is designed to measure which approach is faster.
Options Compared
There are only two options compared in this benchmark:
Pros and Cons
JSON.stringify
due to its complexity and the overhead of traversing the data structures.Library and Its Purpose
The lodash.isEqual
function is part of the popular Lodash library. Lodash provides a collection of reusable functions for common tasks in JavaScript, such as array manipulation, string processing, and object manipulation. In this case, _.isEqual
is used to check if two values are deeply equal.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on the performance comparison between two existing functions.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative ways to compare arrays or objects, here are a few options:
In conclusion, the MeasureThat.net benchmark provides a simple way to compare the performance of two approaches to check for equality between shallow arrays of strings. While _.isEqual
provides a robust way to check for deep equality, JSON.stringify
is faster but may lead to false positives due to its simplicity.