Benchmark: Array (native) vs Ramda

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function double(n) {
	return n*2;
}
var data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30];

Tests:

Array (native)
data.map(double);
Ramda
R.map(double, data);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array (native)
Ramda

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/67.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 67 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Array (native)	2307672.0 Ops/sec
Ramda	852319.5 Ops/sec

Array (native) vs Ramda (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Array (native) vs Ramda

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Array (native)

Ramda

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A