const data = [];
for(let i=0;i<10;i++){
data[i]=[];
for(let j=0;j<24;j++){
data[i][j]=i*10+j;
}
}
var list = [];
for(var i=0;i<data.length;i=i+1){
for(var j=0;j<data[i].length;j=j+1){
list.push(data[i][j]);
}
}
const data = [];
for(let i=0;i<10;i++){
data[i]=[];
for(let j=0;j<24;j++){
data[i][j]=i*10+j;
}
}
const list = data.reduce((pre,current) => {pre.push(current);return pre},[]);
const data = [];
for(let i=0;i<10;i++){
data[i]=[];
for(let j=0;j<24;j++){
data[i][j]=i*10+j;
}
}
const list = data.flat()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for push | |
reduce.concat | |
flat() by es2019 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for push | 376180.2 Ops/sec |
reduce.concat | 346310.1 Ops/sec |
flat() by es2019 | 22808.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different approaches for flattening a 2D array:
Array.prototype.reduce()
method with a callback function that concatenates the elements of each inner array using the spread operator (...
).Array.prototype.flat()
method, which flattens an array to a one-dimensional array.Options Comparison
The three approaches have different pros and cons:
list
variable.for push
approach; leverages a well-known library function (Array.prototype.reduce()
)....
).Library and Syntax Considerations
The reduce()
function is part of the ECMAScript standard and has been supported since ES5. However, the spread operator (...
) was introduced in ES2018 (ES9).
While neither for push
nor flat() by es2019
explicitly uses special JavaScript features or syntax, reduce.concat does rely on the spread operator (...
). The use of this operator might introduce additional overhead or complexity for older browsers that don't support it.
Alternative Approaches
Other possible approaches for flattening a 2D array include:
Array.prototype.map()
and concat()
: const list = data.map(subarray => subarray).flat();
Array.prototype.forEach()
with a callback function: const list = []; data.forEach(subarray => { const sublist = []; subarray.forEach(element => { sublist.push(element); }); list.push(sublist); });
_.flatten()
): const _ = require('lodash'); const list = _.flatten(data).
Keep in mind that these alternatives might have varying levels of performance, readability, and compatibility depending on the specific use case.
In conclusion, the benchmark is designed to evaluate the performance of three different approaches for flattening a 2D array. The choice of approach depends on factors like performance requirements, browser support, and personal preference.