function moreData(arr, left) {
if(left === 0) return arr;
else {
arr.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 256));
return moreData(arr, left - 1);
}
}
function makeTestData() { return moreData([], 4); }
makeTestData().toString()
JSON.stringify(makeTestData());
makeTestData() + ''
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString | |
JSON.stringify | |
type coercion |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString | 453543.7 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 398573.0 Ops/sec |
type coercion | 413757.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of three different approaches to convert a JavaScript array into a string:
toString()
JSON.stringify()
toString()
without using String.prototype.toString()
)Options Compared
The options being compared are:
toString()
: uses the built-in toString()
method to convert the array into a string.JSON.stringify()
: uses the JSON.stringify()
function to serialize the array into a JSON string, which can be converted to a string using toString()
.toString()
without using String.prototype.toString()
.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
toString()
:JSON.stringify()
: toString()
for large arrays, and produces a consistent result regardless of the array's contents. However, it can be slower than toString()
due to the serialization overhead.toString()
for very large arrays.toString()
, but avoids using the slower String.prototype.toString()
method.Library
The benchmark uses the JSON
library, which is a built-in JavaScript library that provides functions for serializing and deserializing JSON data. The JSON.stringify()
function is used to serialize the array into a JSON string, which can be converted to a string using toString()
.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JS features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. It's purely about comparing the performance of different approaches to convert an array into a string.
Other Alternatives
If you were to implement this benchmark, other alternatives could include:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be relevant to the current benchmark's goals, but they could be explored in other contexts.