function moreData(arr, left) {
if(left === 0) return arr;
else {
arr.push({
data: {
properties: {
string: "value",
parameter: Math.floor(Math.random() * 256)
},
embeddedArray: new Array(Math.floor(Math.random() * 100)).fill(0)
}
});
return moreData(arr, left - 1);
}
}
function makeTestData() { return moreData([], 4); }
makeTestData().toString()
JSON.stringify(makeTestData());
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString | 411423.6 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 210478.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing the performance of two methods to convert complex data structures into strings: Array.toString()
vs JSON.stringify()
. The test case creates an array of objects, where each object has a nested structure with multiple levels of complexity. This represents a common scenario in JavaScript development.
Options being compared
Two options are being compared:
Array.toString()
: This method converts the entire array into a string by concatenating all elements.JSON.stringify()
: This method converts the array into a JSON-formatted string, which can be human-readable and easily parseable by other languages.Pros and Cons of each approach
Array.toString()
:
Pros:
toString()
is a simple, lightweight method that doesn't require any additional libraries or overhead.toString()
is generally faster since it only requires iterating over the elements in the array.Cons:
JSON.stringify()
:
Pros:
JSON.stringify()
can handle nested structures, including objects and arrays.Cons:
JSON.stringify()
requires more overhead than toString()
, especially for large datasets.JSON.stringify()
is generally slower since it needs to create a tree-like structure to represent the data.Library usage
None of the test cases use any libraries beyond built-in JavaScript functions (e.g., Array.toString()
, Math.random()
).
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browsers may have additional optimizations or extensions for these methods.
Other alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to serialize complex data structures in JavaScript:
JSON.parse()
and JSON.stringify()
with a custom replacer: You can use JSON.parse()
and JSON.stringify()
with a custom replacer function to create a more readable and controllable serialization process.Lodash
): Libraries like Lodash provide functions for serializing complex data structures, such as cloneDeep()
or toJSON()
.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs and might not be suitable for all use cases.