Benchmark: for (key in obj) vs Object.keys(object)

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {};
var count = 10;
do {
    obj["key" + count + ""] = "val" + count + "";
} while(count--);

var temp = [];
for(var key in obj) {
   temp.push(obj[key]);
}

var objKey = [];
var keys = Object.keys(obj);
for(var i = 0, len = keys.length; i < len; i++) {
   objKey.push(obj[keys[i]]);
}

Tests:

for (key in obj)
var temp = []; for(var key in obj) { temp.push(obj[key]); }
Object.keys(obj)
var objKey = []; var keys = Object.keys(obj); for(var i = 0, len = keys.length; i < len; i++) { objKey.push(obj[keys[i]]); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for (key in obj)
Object.keys(obj)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.106 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 68 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for (key in obj)	454244.9 Ops/sec
Object.keys(obj)	392581.9 Ops/sec

for (key in obj) vs Object.keys(object) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: for (key in obj) vs Object.keys(obj)

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

for (key in obj)

Object.keys(obj)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A