var obj = {'a': 1}
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) {
let first
for (let key in obj) {
first = key
break
}
}
for (var i=10000; i > 0; i--) {
const first = Object.keys(obj)[0]
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for-in | |
Object.keys |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for-in | 137.3 Ops/sec |
Object.keys | 49.1 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases that compare the performance of two approaches to retrieve the first key of an object: for-in
loop and using the Object.keys()
method.
What is being tested?
In this case, we're testing how fast it takes to execute a loop that iterates from 10,000 to 1 (inclusive) and uses either a for-in
loop or the Object.keys()
method to retrieve the first key of an object. The object in question is predefined as obj = {'a': 1}
.
Options being compared:
for
loop, which uses the in
operator to get the property names.Pros and cons:
Other considerations:
let
instead of var
in both test cases might affect the performance, but it's unlikely to have a significant impact in this specific benchmark.'a': 1
), which makes this benchmark more about comparing the two approaches rather than testing with larger objects.Libraries and special features:
In both test cases, no external libraries are used. There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition.
Alternatives:
To further compare the performance of these two approaches, you could consider adding more test cases, such as:
for-in
loop versus Object.keys()
method with different data structures (e.g., arrays, maps)By exploring these alternatives, you can gain a better understanding of how JavaScript engines optimize these specific use cases.