isBalanced1 = (s, o, v, rx1, rx2) => {
rx1 = /[^\(\)\{\}\[\]]/g;
rx2 = /\[\]|\{\}|\(\)/g;
v = ['()', '{}', '[]', ''];
o = s.replace(rx1, '');
for (let i = 0; i < o.length; i += 0.5) {
o = o.split(rx2).join``;
}
return v.includes(o);
};
const test = '[[[{{{((()))}}}]]]';
console.log(isBalanced1(test));
isBalanced2 = (s, o, v, rx1, rx2) => {
rx1 = /[^\(\)\{\}\[\]]/g;
rx2 = /\[\]|\{\}|\(\)/g;
v = ['()', '{}', '[]', ''];
o = s.replace(rx1, '');
for (let i = 0; i < o.length; i += 0.5) {
o = o.replace(rx2, '');
}
return v.includes(o);
};
const test = '[[[{{{((()))}}}]]]';
console.log(isBalanced2(test));
isBalanced3 = (s, o, v, rx1, rx2) => {
rx1 = /[^\(\)\{\}\[\]]/g;
rx2 = /\[\]|\{\}|\(\)/g;
v = ['()', '{}', '[]', ''];
o = s.replace(rx1, '');
for (let i = 0; i < o.length; i++) {
if (v.includes(`${o[i]}${o[i + 1]}`)) {
o = o.slice(0, i).concat(o.slice(i + 2, o.length));
i -= 2;
}
}
return v.includes(o);
};
const test = '[[[{{{((()))}}}]]]';
console.log(isBalanced3(test));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
split - join | |
replace | |
slice and concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
split - join | 56351.1 Ops/sec |
replace | 75195.3 Ops/sec |
slice and concat | 62843.1 Ops/sec |
Measuring the performance of JavaScript microbenchmarks like this is an fascinating task.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark defines three different algorithms for checking if a string s
is balanced, which means that it consists only of valid bracket pairs: ()
, {}
, and []
. The input string test
contains a long sequence of nested brackets. The algorithm's goal is to remove the invalid brackets from the string and check if the resulting string can be formed by matching each pair of opening and closing brackets.
Benchmark Options Compared
There are three algorithms being compared:
[
, ]
, {
, }
, or (
and then joins these substrings back together without any separators.split - join
but replaces each pair of adjacent opening and closing brackets in the resulting string with an empty string, effectively removing them.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
replace
and can handle more complex bracket patterns.replace
due to the overhead of regular expressions and string manipulation.replace
, but with the added flexibility of being able to remove any adjacent pairs of brackets, not just opening ones.replace
and may require more resources for execution.Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in these benchmarks. The regular expressions used are built-in JavaScript features (/[^\\(\\)\\{\\}\\[\\]]/g
and /\\[\\]|\\{\\}|\\(\\)/g
). No external libraries or frameworks are required to run the benchmarks.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in these benchmarks. They only utilize built-in features like regular expressions, string manipulation methods (e.g., split
, join
, concat
), and array methods (e.g., includes
) that are part of the standard language.
Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to solve this problem could include:
However, these alternative approaches may require significant additional resources and expertise, making the replace
, split - join
, and slice and concat
methods suitable for a simple benchmarking comparison.