Benchmark: lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread vs lodash assign

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

lodash merge
const a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; const b = { c: 'goddess' }; const c = _.merge(a, b);
object assign
const a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; const b = { c: 'goddess' }; const c = Object.assign(a, b);
spread
const a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; const b = { c: 'goddess' }; const c = { ...a, ...b };
lodash assign
const a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; const b = { c: 'goddess' }; const c = _.assign(a, b);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash merge
object assign
spread
lodash assign

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks.

The provided JSON represents a set of microbenchmarks that test different approaches to merge two objects in JavaScript. The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of `lodash.merge`, `Object.assign`, spread syntax `{ ...a, ...b }`, and `lodash.assign` methods.

**Options Compared:**

1. **Lodash Merge (`_.merge(a, b)`)**: This method takes two objects as arguments and returns a new object that contains the merged properties from both input objects.
2. **Object Assign (`Object.assign(a, b)`)**: This method creates a new object by copying all enumerable own properties from one or more source objects into a target object.
3. **Spread Syntax `{ ...a, ...b }`**: This syntax uses rest spread operator to merge two objects into a single object.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **Lodash Merge (`_.merge(a, b)`)**:
	* Pros: Simple and concise implementation, can handle complex merges (e.g., arrays, null/undefined values).
	* Cons: External dependency on Lodash library, may have slower startup times.
2. **Object Assign (`Object.assign(a, b)`)**:
	* Pros: Built-in JavaScript method, no external dependencies, fast execution time.
	* Cons: Limited support for complex merges (e.g., arrays), may not handle null/undefined values correctly.
3. **Spread Syntax `{ ...a, ...b }`**:
	* Pros: Concise and expressive syntax, easy to read and write.
	* Cons: May have slower execution times compared to built-in methods or Lodash implementation.

**Lodash Library and its Purpose:**

The Lodash library provides a set of utility functions for functional programming in JavaScript. `lodash.merge` is one of these utility functions, designed to simplify object merging and other tasks that require array and object manipulation.

**Other Considerations:**

When choosing an approach, consider the following factors:

* **Performance**: If speed is crucial, Object Assign or Spread Syntax might be better options.
* **Complexity**: If dealing with complex merges (e.g., arrays), Lodash Merge might be a more suitable choice.
* **Code Readability and Maintainability**: Spread Syntax can improve code readability, especially for simple object merges.

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives to the benchmarked methods include:

* **Merge Functions**: Custom implementation of `merge` functions using other libraries like Ramda or Immutable.js.
* **Built-in Object Methods**: Using built-in JavaScript methods like `Object.assign()` with a custom implementation or by chaining multiple method calls (e.g., `Object.assign(this, obj1).assign(obj2)`).
* **Other Library Functions**: Other libraries like Underscore.js or Ramda provide similar functionality to Lodash Merge.

Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.99 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 97 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash merge	2748079.8 Ops/sec
object assign	7886782.0 Ops/sec
spread	2060779.5 Ops/sec
lodash assign	6053604.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread vs lodash assign (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash merge vs object assign vs spread vs lodash assign

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash merge

object assign

spread

lodash assign

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):