<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' };
var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 'a', e: 'b', j: { asd: 'test' } };
var c = _.merge({}, a, b);
var c = Object.assign({}, a, b);
var c = { a, b };
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash merge | |
object.assign | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash merge | 1481575.6 Ops/sec |
object.assign | 7577954.5 Ops/sec |
spread | 9130066.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided JSON represents a benchmarking test created on MeasureThat.net, which compares the performance of three approaches for merging two objects: Lodash's merge
function, Object.assign
, and spread operator (...
). The goal is to determine which method is the most efficient.
Options Compared
merge
function: This approach uses a library (Lodash) to merge the two objects.Object.assign
: This approach uses a built-in JavaScript method to merge the two objects....
): This approach uses a new feature in modern JavaScript to create a new object by spreading the properties of two existing objects.Pros and Cons
merge
function:Object.assign
:...
):Library and Syntax
The benchmark uses Lodash's merge
function, which is a utility library for functional programming. The spread operator (...
) is a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6).
Benchmark Preparation Code
The provided script preparation code sets up two objects, a
and b
, to be merged:
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' };
var b = { c: 'goddess', d: 'a', e: 'b', j: { asd: 'test' } };
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:
jsonmerge
or deepmerge
can be used instead of Lodash's merge
.reduce()
method or a custom loop could be used to merge objects.${...}
) could be used to concatenate object properties.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches may vary depending on your specific use case and environment.