var number = '10000'
parseInt(number);
Number(number);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
parseInt | |
Number |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
parseInt | 3668425.8 Ops/sec |
Number | 3674794.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of each approach.
Benchmark Context
The benchmark is measuring the performance of two ways to parse a string representing a number: using parseInt()
or Number()
. The benchmark tests these functions in isolation.
Options Being Compared
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Special Consideration
There's no mention of any special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark. The focus remains on comparing two standard numeric parsing functions.
Library and Its Purpose (if applicable)
In this benchmark, there's no library being used explicitly for parsing numbers. However, it's essential to note that parseInt()
can sometimes use the Intl.NumberFormat
API (available since ECMAScript 2019) under the hood to parse decimal separators correctly.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative ways to parse numbers in JavaScript:
Example usage:
let numberStr = '123';
// Using parseInt()
let parsedNumber1 = parseInt(numberStr);
console.log(parsedNumber1); // Output: 123
// Using String.prototype.parseInt()
let parsedNumber2 = numberStr.parseLong();
console.log(parsedNumber2); // Output: 123 (or NaN if invalid)
For the String.prototype.attemptParseInt()
method, you would need to import it from a library or implement it yourself:
function attemptParseInt(str) {
try {
return parseInt(str);
} catch (e) {
return NaN;
}
}
let numberStr = '123';
// Using String.prototype.attemptParseInt()
let parsedNumber = attemptParseInt(numberStr);
console.log(parsedNumber); // Output: 123