var strNum = '6969699.1'
var imp = + strNum
var toStr = parseFloat(strNum)
var num = Number(strNum)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
implicit | |
parseFloat | |
Number |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
implicit | 1601476480.0 Ops/sec |
parseFloat | 26722464.0 Ops/sec |
Number | 1379750016.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its various aspects.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of three different approaches for converting a string number to a numerical value in JavaScript: implicit conversion, parseFloat()
, and Number()
.
The test cases use the following script preparation code:
var strNum = '6969699.1';
This code defines a variable strNum
with the value '6969699.1'
, which is a string representation of the decimal number 6,699,690.
Test Cases
There are three test cases:
var imp = + strNum;
In JavaScript, the +
operator is used for both arithmetic and numeric conversions. This means that when the +
operator encounters a string literal, it attempts to interpret the entire string as a single number.
parseFloat()
function to convert the string to a floating-point number:var toStr = parseFloat(strNum);
The parseFloat()
function is used to parse a string and return a floating-point number.
Number()
function to convert the string to an integer or float, depending on its value:var num = Number(strNum);
In JavaScript, the Number()
function can take two arguments: a single value (which is converted to a number) and a radix argument (which specifies the base of the number in the range 1-36).
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
Library
There are no external libraries used in this benchmark.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's commonly available in modern browsers.
Other Alternatives
If you were to compare these approaches on a different platform, such as Node.js or a web framework like React Native, you might also consider using other methods like:
big.js
, decimal.js
): These libraries can provide more precise control over the conversion process, especially when working with very large or small numbers.However, in general web browsers are unlikely to be a bottleneck for these kinds of conversions, and the differences between these approaches will likely be relatively small.