<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/js-yaml/3.12.0/js-yaml.min.js"></script>
var jsonString = '{"key1": "val1", "key2": 7}';
var yamlString = 'key1: val1\nkey2: 7';
var dummy = JSON.parse(jsonString);
var dummy = jsyaml.safeLoad(yamlString);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JSON.parse() | |
js-yaml |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JSON.parse() | 10756361.0 Ops/sec |
js-yaml | 1200987.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The Script Preparation Code
section defines two JavaScript variables:
jsonString
: a JSON string containing an object with two key-value pairs: "key1": "val1"
and "key2": 7
.yamlString
: a YAML string containing the same data as jsonString
, but in YAML format.The Html Preparation Code
section includes a script tag that loads the js-yaml
library, which is used to parse the yamlString
.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
js-yaml
library.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
JSON.parse()
.js-yaml
library to be loaded, which may add overhead, and its performance may be slower due to the additional complexity.Library: js-yaml
The js-yaml
library is a JavaScript implementation of the YAML data serialization format. It provides methods for parsing and generating YAML data, including safeLoad()
(used in this benchmark) and other functions like dump()
and schema()
.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax that are specific to a particular browser or version of JavaScript.
Other Alternatives
If you want to compare the performance of different JSON parsing libraries, you could also consider adding benchmarks for:
xml2js
, which is a popular JavaScript library for parsing XML and YAML data.Keep in mind that each alternative has its own pros and cons, and the choice of library ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.