<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/js-yaml/3.12.0/js-yaml.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/yamljs/0.3.0/yaml.min.js"></script>
var yamlString = 'key1: val1\nkey2: 7';
var dummy = YAML.parse(yamlString);
var dummy = jsyaml.safeLoad(yamlString);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
yaml-js | |
js-yaml |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
yaml-js | 524176.9 Ops/sec |
js-yaml | 1071745.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
What is tested?
The provided benchmark tests two JavaScript libraries, js-yaml and yaml-js, which are used to parse YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language) strings. The test case creates a YAML string, loads it using each library, and measures the execution time.
Options compared:
There are two options being compared:
Pros and cons of each approach:
Library considerations:
Special JavaScript features or syntax:
None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark, but keep in mind that other benchmarks might involve testing specific JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or ES6+ syntax.
Other alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative YAML parsers in JavaScript, some options include:
In summary, this benchmark compares two popular JavaScript libraries for parsing YAML strings: js-yaml and yaml-js. While both provide good results, js-yaml is a more strict implementation that ensures consistency across different versions, while yaml-js offers faster execution times at the cost of some flexibility in its adherence to the YAML specification.