Benchmark: jQuery event On Performance with event set on each item

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>

<style>
  #container { visibility: hidden; }
</style>

<div id="container">
</div>

Script Preparation code:

var container = $('#container')
var itemCount = 500;

for (var i = 0; i < itemCount; i++) {
  container.append('<div>Item ' + i + '</div>');
}

var items = container.children();

Tests:

.each loop and single on-assignement
items.each(function(index,item) { var $item = $(item); $item.on('click', function() { console.log('Item clicked'); }); });
no loop and .on-assignement on list
items.on('click', function() { console.log('Item clicked'); });
assign event for each item
items.click(function() { console.log('Item clicked'); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
.each loop and single on-assignement
no loop and .on-assignement on list
assign event for each item

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.67 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 70 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
.each loop and single on-assignement	1142.2 Ops/sec
no loop and .on-assignement on list	1964.0 Ops/sec
assign event for each item	1817.8 Ops/sec

jQuery event On Performance with event set on each item (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: .each loop and single on-assignement vs no loop and .on-assignement on list vs assign event for each item

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

.each loop and single on-assignement

no loop and .on-assignement on list

assign event for each item

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A