Benchmark: jQuery event On Performance

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js"></script>

<style>
  #container { visibility: hidden; }
</style>

<div id="container">
</div>

Script Preparation code:

var container = $('#container')
var itemCount = 300;

for (var i = 0; i < itemCount; i++) {
  container.append('<div>Item ' + i + '</div>');
}

var items = container.children();

Tests:

.each loop and multiple on-assignenements
items.each(function(index,item) { var $item = $(item); $item.on('click', function() { console.log('Item clicked'); }); $item.on('hover', function() { console.log('Item hovered'); }); $item.on('mouseenter', function() { console.log('Item mouseentered'); }); });
.each loop and single on-assignement
items.each(function(index,item) { var $item = $(item); $item.on('click', function() { console.log('Item clicked'); }); });
no loop and .on-assignement on list
items.on('click', function() { console.log('Item clicked'); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
.each loop and multiple on-assignenements
.each loop and single on-assignement
no loop and .on-assignement on list

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring JavaScript performance is a complex task, as it depends on various factors such as the specific use case, hardware, and software configurations.

The provided benchmark definition json represents a test for jQuery event handling performance. The script preparation code creates an HTML container with 300 child elements, which are then wrapped by the jQuery library. This setup allows us to measure how efficiently the browser can handle multiple events on each element.

Here's a breakdown of the options being compared:

1. **.each loop and single `.on-assignment`**: In this test, we attach only one event listener to each element using `.on()`. The `items.each()` function iterates over the elements, but it does not modify them. This approach is simple and might be faster because it reduces memory allocations.
2. **.each loop and multiple `.on-assignments`**: In this test, we attach multiple events listeners to each element using `.on()`, one for click, hover, and mouseenter events. This approach simulates a more complex scenario where elements have multiple handlers attached.
3. **No loop and `.on-assignment on list`**: In this test, we directly assign event listeners to the `items` list without using an iterator or a loop. This approach is likely faster because it avoids the overhead of iterating over elements.

Now, let's discuss the pros and cons of each approach:

* **.each loop and single `.on-assignment`**:
	+ Pros: Simple, fast execution.
	+ Cons: May not cover all edge cases or complex scenarios.
* **.each loop and multiple `.on-assignments`**:
	+ Pros: More realistic scenario for many use cases.
	+ Cons: Can be slower due to the overhead of attaching multiple event listeners.
* **No loop and `.on-assignment on list`**:
	+ Pros: Fast execution, often preferred in browser engines for performance-critical code.
	+ Cons: May not cover all edge cases or complex scenarios.

In terms of library usage, jQuery provides several functions for event handling, including:

1. **$.each()**: An iterator function that iterates over elements and allows attaching event listeners.
2. **$.on()**: A function for attaching one or more event listeners to an element.
3. **$().on()**: A shorthand method for attaching a single event listener to multiple elements.

Other considerations when writing performance-critical JavaScript code include:

* Using `requestAnimationFrame()` instead of `setInterval()` for animations and updates.
* Avoiding global variables and using closures or modules to minimize variable scope.
* Utilizing browser-specific APIs, such as Web Workers or WebAssembly, for parallel processing.
* Profile-guided optimization, where you analyze the performance bottlenecks in your code and optimize those areas first.

For alternatives to MeasureThat.net, consider the following options:

1. **Benchmark.js**: A lightweight benchmarking library that supports various test cases, including event handling and memory allocation benchmarks.
2. **WebPageTest**: A comprehensive web performance testing tool that measures page load times, resource usage, and more.
3. **Google Chrome DevTools**: Provides built-in performance profiling tools for measuring CPU, GPU, and memory usage in your JavaScript applications.

These alternatives offer varying degrees of complexity and customization options, so be sure to review their documentation and choose the one that best fits your needs.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/61.0.3163.100 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 61 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
.each loop and multiple on-assignenements	17.1 Ops/sec
.each loop and single on-assignement	178.4 Ops/sec
no loop and .on-assignement on list	30.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

jQuery event On Performance (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: .each loop and multiple on-assignenements vs .each loop and single on-assignement vs no loop and .on-assignement on list

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

.each loop and multiple on-assignenements

.each loop and single on-assignement

no loop and .on-assignement on list

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 27 days ago):