var times = 1000;
var arr = [];
arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < times; i++) {
arr.push(1337);
}
arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < times; i++) {
arr[i] = 1337;
}
arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < times; i++) {
arr[arr.length] = 1337;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
push | |
index | |
index insert at last position |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
push | 5658.5 Ops/sec |
index | 6126.3 Ops/sec |
index insert at last position | 4237.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its components.
Benchmark Description
The benchmark compares three different approaches to append an item to an array in JavaScript:
push
arr[i] = 1337
)arr[arr.length] = 1337
)These approaches are used to measure their performance, and the results will help determine which method is faster.
Options Compared
The three options compared in this benchmark are:
push
: This is a built-in JavaScript method that appends an item to the end of an array.length
property to get the current length of the array and appending to it.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach:
length
property to access the end of the array. It's also relatively simple and easy to understand.push
Library Usage
There is no library explicitly mentioned in this benchmark definition.
Special JS Features/Syntax
None of the approaches in this benchmark rely on special JavaScript features or syntax. They are all standard, widely-supported methods.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to appending items to an array, here are a few options:
unshift()
instead of push()
: This method appends an item to the beginning of the array.splice()
with negative indices: You can use negative indices to remove or insert items at specific positions within the array.compact
function: This function can be used to append items to an array in a more functional programming style.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, complexity levels, and use cases compared to the methods presented in this benchmark.