Benchmark: Array .push() vs .unshift() multiple

Script Preparation code:

var arr = Array.from(Array(10000), (val, index) => index);

Tests:

.unshift()
arr.unshift(42)
.push()
arr.push(42)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
.unshift()
.push()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**What is tested?**

The provided benchmark tests two different methods for adding elements to an array: `arr.unshift(42)` and `arr.push(42)`. The goal is to compare their performance in a controlled environment.

**Options compared:**

There are only two options being compared:

1. **`arr.unshift(42)`**: This method adds the element at the beginning of the array.
2. **`arr.push(42)`**: This method adds the element at the end of the array.

**Pros and Cons:**

*   **`arr.unshift(42)`**: This method is generally faster than `push()` because it only needs to shift elements from the current end of the array, reducing the number of operations required. However, it modifies the array in place, which might be less efficient for large arrays if the array needs to be preserved.
*   **`arr.push(42)`**: This method is often considered more intuitive and easier to use than `unshift()`, especially when adding elements at the end of an array. It's also a good choice when you want to preserve the original array.

**Library and syntax:**

There is no external library used in this benchmark, so it relies solely on built-in JavaScript functionality. There are no special JS features or syntax being tested in this case.

**Alternative approaches:**

Other alternatives for adding elements to an array might include:

*   **Using `Array.prototype.concat()`**: You could use `concat()` with the element you want to add as an argument, like so: `arr = arr.concat([42])`. However, this method is generally slower and more memory-intensive than `push()`.
*   **Using `Array.prototype.splice()`**: This method would also work for adding elements at the end of the array, but it's typically less efficient due to its use of multiple operations (insertion at a specific index).
*   **Using other data structures**: Depending on your needs, you might consider using data structures like linked lists or stacks instead of arrays.

**Benchmark preparation code:**

The provided `Script Preparation Code` is used to create an array with 10,000 elements, each initialized with its index value. This allows for a fair comparison between the different methods being tested.

Here's how the script works:

```javascript
var arr = Array.from(Array(10000), (val, index) => index);
```

In this code snippet:

*   `Array.from()` is used to create an array with elements initialized by a callback function.
*   `(val, index) => index` defines the value for each element in the new array. The callback function receives two parameters: the current element from the outer array (`val`) and its index in that array (`index`).

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 25 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/129.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Chrome 129 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
.unshift()	39231.8 Ops/sec
.push()	11287872.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array .push() vs .unshift() multiple (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: .unshift() vs .push()

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

.unshift()

.push()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):