<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
var data = [{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}];
var result = JSON.stringify(data) === JSON.stringify([{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}])
var result = R.equals(data, [{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Stringify | |
Ramda |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Stringify | 1790509.2 Ops/sec |
Ramda | 223480.1 Ops/sec |
In the benchmark you provided, two different approaches are being tested for deep equality checks between complex objects in JavaScript: using the built-in JSON.stringify()
method and using the R.equals()
method from the Ramda library.
JSON.stringify() Method:
var result = JSON.stringify(data) === JSON.stringify([{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}]);
JSON.stringify()
converts JavaScript objects into a JSON string, allowing for a straightforward way to compare the serialized formats of two objects. If the serialized strings are identical, the objects are considered equal.JSON.stringify()
achieved 1,790,509.25 executions per second.Pros:
Cons:
JSON.stringify()
does not guarantee the order of properties in the output.Ramda's R.equals() Method:
var result = R.equals(data, [{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}]);
R.equals()
checks for deep equality between two values. It examines the structure and properties of objects directly rather than converting them to strings. This method can handle more complex scenarios compared to JSON.stringify()
.R.equals()
achieved 223,480.125 executions per second.Pros:
Cons:
JSON.stringify()
in this benchmark scenario due to the complexity of deep equality checking.When considering these two approaches, it's also important to factor in the complexity of the objects being compared. For simpler objects, JSON.stringify()
might be sufficient and will perform faster. However, for applications involving more complex data or requiring more robust comparison capabilities, using a library like Ramda or exploring other libraries (like Lodash with its _.isEqual()
method) may be the preferred choice. Each alternative has its own performance and memory implications that should be evaluated based on the specific use case.
In conclusion, the benchmark compares two methods for deep equality checking in JavaScript: JSON.stringify()
, which is fast but limited in capability, and R.equals()
from Ramda, which is more versatile but slower. The choice between them ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the application, balancing the need for performance against the complexity of data structures being handled.