<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
var data = [{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}];
var result = R.toString(data, [{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}]);
var result = JSON.stringify(data) === JSON.stringify([{foo: {bar: {foo: {bar: ''}}}}, {}, {}]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Ramda | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Ramda | 95177.2 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 1581000.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark compares two approaches to convert JavaScript objects to strings: Ramda's toString
function and the built-in JSON.stringify
method.
Options compared
toString
: This is a utility function from the Ramda library that converts an object to a string. It's designed to work with functional programming concepts like immutable data structures.JSON.stringify
: This is a built-in JavaScript method that converts an object (or any value) to a JSON string.Pros and Cons
toString
:JSON.stringify
:Library usage
The benchmark uses the Ramda library, which is a collection of reusable functions for functional programming. The toString
function is specifically designed to work with complex data structures like nested objects.
Special JavaScript features or syntax
None mentioned in this specific benchmark, but it's worth noting that some benchmarks may test more advanced JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or modern web APIs.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in alternative string conversion methods, here are a few examples:
concat()
, but it's specifically designed for joining arrays of strings.These alternatives might be relevant in specific use cases, but they're not typically used as direct replacements for JSON.stringify
or Ramda's toString
.
In summary, this benchmark compares two efficient string conversion methods: Ramda's toString
and the built-in JSON.stringify
. The choice between these options depends on your specific requirements, familiarity with functional programming concepts, and performance needs.