<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
// This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
// await someThing();
}
let buf ='';
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/
buf = Math.random().toString();
buf = Math.random().toFixed(4);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString() | |
toFixed(4) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString() | 3579717.5 Ops/sec |
toFixed(4) | 3220414.2 Ops/sec |
The benchmark conducted on MeasureThat.net compares the performance of two different methods for converting a number to a string in JavaScript: toString()
and toFixed()
. The focus is on how efficiently these methods handle numbers with many decimal places in the context of JavaScript execution.
toString()
executed approximately 5,903,817 operations per second.toFixed(4)
method executed slightly lower at around 5,782,441 operations per second.toString()
:
toFixed(4)
:
Context of Use:
toString()
is preferable for performance. If specific decimal representation is crucial, toFixed()
is necessary despite its minor impact on performance.Alternatives:
Decimal.js
or Big.js
: These libraries provide capabilities for accurate decimal arithmetic and can manage formatting better for applications requiring high precision.Performance Variability:
This benchmark provides insight into the performance differences between toString()
and toFixed(4)
, guiding developers on which method to use based on performance requirements and the need for numeric representation formatting. Depending on the application context, the choice of method can significantly influence efficiency and correctness.