const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = { firstObject, secondObject }
const firstObject = { sampleData: 'Hello world' }
const secondObject = { moreData: 'foo bar' }
const finalObject = { sampleData: firstObject.sampleData, moreData: secondObject.moreData }
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | |
Using Raw |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Using the spread operator | 1996157.9 Ops/sec |
Using Raw | 625954880.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the provided benchmark.
Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for creating a new object in JavaScript: using the spread operator (...
) and using raw assignment with property access (obj1.property = obj2.property;
). The goal is to determine which approach is faster, more efficient, or both.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
...
) to create a new object by spreading two existing objects (firstObject
and secondObject
) into one new object (finalObject
). The syntax looks like this: { ...firstObject, ...secondObject }
.firstObject
) to another object (finalObject
), and then adding properties from a third object (secondObject
). The syntax looks like this: const finalObject = { sampleData: firstObject.sampleData, moreData: secondObject.moreData }
.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Using the Spread Operator:
Pros:
Cons:
...
expression)Raw Assignment with Property Access:
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
When evaluating the performance difference between these two approaches, other factors come into play, such as:
Library Used (None)
There are no libraries used in this benchmark. The test cases use only built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The ...
syntax in the spread operator is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for concise object creation and merging.
Overall, while using the spread operator can lead to more readable code and may be more intuitive for some developers, raw assignment with property access might provide performance advantages. However, this benchmark only measures execution time, not code quality or maintainability.