<p id="foo">Foo</p>
<p id="bar">Bar</p>
<p id="baz">Baz</p>
var bar = document.getElementById("bar");
var bar = document.querySelector("#bar");
var selector = "#bar",
func = selector.match('^#[A-z0-9-]*$') ? "getElementById" : "querySelector",
bar = document[func]("bar");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementById | |
querySelector | |
getElementById or querySelector |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementById | 4098899.5 Ops/sec |
querySelector | 2331214.8 Ops/sec |
getElementById or querySelector | 1832793.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.
Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of three approaches for retrieving an HTML element by its ID:
document.getElementById
document.querySelector
getElementById
and querySelector
based on a regular expression pattern.Library: DOM (Document Object Model)
Both test cases use the Document Object Model (DOM) library, which is a standard API for manipulating HTML documents in JavaScript. The DOM provides a way to interact with the document's elements, attributes, and content.
In this benchmark, document.getElementById
and document.querySelector
are used to retrieve an element by its ID. These methods are part of the W3C specification and are widely supported across different browsers and devices.
Dynamic Approach
The third test case uses a dynamic approach that checks if the provided selector matches a pattern using regular expressions. If the pattern matches, it uses getElementById
; otherwise, it uses querySelector
. The pattern ^#[A-z0-9-]*$
is used to match any string starting with #
followed by one or more alphanumeric characters and hyphens.
Regular Expressions
The dynamic approach uses regular expressions to check the selector. Regular expressions are a way to describe patterns in strings using a specialized syntax. In this case, the pattern ^#[A-z0-9-]*$
matches any string that:
#
[A-z0-9-]*
)$
The regular expression engine will check if the provided selector matches this pattern. If it does, the dynamic approach uses getElementById
; otherwise, it uses querySelector
.
Performance Considerations
When comparing the performance of these approaches, several factors come into play:
document.getElementById
and document.querySelector
have some overhead due to the DOM operations involved. However, querySelector
may incur additional overhead due to its more complex algorithm.document.getElementById
are cacheable by the browser, which means that if you call this method multiple times with the same argument, the result is stored in the browser's cache and reused on subsequent calls. This can improve performance but may also lead to stale results if the DOM changes between calls.Alternatives
Some alternative approaches for retrieving an HTML element by its ID include:
document.querySelector
with a more specific selector, such as #bar
However, these alternatives may not be suitable for every use case, and the choice of approach ultimately depends on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.