Benchmark: replaceAll vs regex replace vs regex replace2

Script Preparation code:

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(search, replacement) {
    var target = this;
    return target.replace(new RegExp(search, 'g'), replacement);
};

Tests:

replace regex
"this is it".replace(/ /g, "+");
replace All
"this is it".replaceAll(" ", "+");
replace regex 2
"this is it".replace(/\s+/g, "+");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
replace regex
replace All
replace regex 2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the JavaScript microbenchmark you've provided.

**Overview**

The benchmark tests three different approaches for replacing substrings in a string: `replaceAll`, `regex replace`, and `regex replace2`. The goal is to compare their performance, execution speed, and consistency across various browsers and devices.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The Benchmark Definition JSON contains the metadata for the benchmark:

* `"Name"`: The name of the benchmark (`"replaceAll vs regex replace vs regex replace2"`).
* `"Description"`: A brief description of the benchmark (null in this case).
* `"Script Preparation Code"`: A JavaScript code snippet that defines a custom `String.prototype.replaceAll` method. This method is used to make the `replaceAll` approach more comparable to the regular expression-based approaches.
* `"Html Preparation Code"`: An empty string, indicating no HTML preparation is required for this benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case represents a specific implementation:

1. **"replace regex"`**: Tests the performance of using a regular expression with the `g` flag to replace whitespace characters (`\s+`) with a `+`.
	* `"Benchmark Definition"`: A JavaScript code snippet that uses the `.replace()` method with a regular expression to replace whitespace characters.
2. **"replace All"`**: Tests the performance of using the custom `replaceAll` method defined in the Script Preparation Code.
3. **"replace regex 2"`**: Similar to "replace regex", but uses a different replacement string (`\s+`) and flag (`g`) combination.

**Libraries Used**

In this benchmark, only JavaScript's built-in functions are used:

* `.replace()`
* `RegExp` (for creating regular expressions)

No external libraries or frameworks are required for this benchmark.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is commonly known. The focus is on the performance comparison between different replacement approaches.

**Alternatives and Considerations**

When working with string replacements, other approaches to consider include:

1. **Using `String.prototype.replace()` without a regular expression**: This method would be slower than using `RegExp` for replacing substrings.
2. **Using a library like `lodash` or `underscore`**: These libraries provide optimized string manipulation functions that might outperform the built-in methods used in this benchmark.
3. **Compiling the JavaScript code**: For a more performance-critical application, compiling the JavaScript code using tools like V8 (Google's JavaScript engine) or a Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler could potentially improve execution speed.

Keep in mind that these alternatives would require additional setup and configuration to integrate into an existing project.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring further performance optimizations, consider the following:

1. **Use Web Workers**: If you need to perform CPU-intensive operations, using Web Workers can help offload tasks from the main thread.
2. **Async/Await**: Using `async/await` for asynchronous operations can make your code easier to read and maintain while also reducing overhead.
3. **Caching**: Implementing caching mechanisms for repeated computations or lookups can significantly improve performance in certain scenarios.

Feel free to ask if you'd like more information on these alternatives!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 124 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
replace regex	10831646.0 Ops/sec
replace All	3220659.5 Ops/sec
replace regex 2	9049003.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

replaceAll vs regex replace vs regex replace2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: replace regex vs replace All vs replace regex 2

Created: 2 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

replace regex

replace All

replace regex 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):