Benchmark: array includes vs object key -1

Script Preparation code:

var obj = (new Array(1000)).fill(null).reduce((prev, newVal) => {prev[Math.random() + ''] = Math.random() + ''; return prev; }, { sausage: 'tst' });
var array = Object.keys(obj);

Tests:

array.includes
array.includes('sausage')
obj[key]
!!obj['sausage']

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array.includes
obj[key]

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks: `array.includes` and `obj[key]`. The benchmarks are designed to measure the performance difference between using the `.includes()` method on an array and accessing object properties using bracket notation (`[]`) or double square bracket notation (`[][]`).

**Options compared**

Two approaches are being compared:

1. **Array.includes**: This approach uses the built-in `includes()` method on an array to search for a specific value.
2. **obj[key]**: This approach uses bracket notation to access an object property using a key.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

* **Array.includes**:
	+ Pros: Efficient, concise, and widely supported.
	+ Cons: May be slower than direct access in some cases (e.g., when the array is sparse).
* **obj[key]**:
	+ Pros: Can be faster for sparse arrays or objects, as it only checks for existence, not value equality.
	+ Cons: Less efficient and less concise than `includes()`, with more overhead due to the explicit key lookup.

**Library used**

The benchmark uses the built-in JavaScript methods `Object.keys()` and `reduce()` to create a large array of random objects. The `sausage` property is generated randomly for each object, but its value is not relevant to the benchmark.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in this benchmark. It only uses standard JavaScript language constructs and built-in methods.

**Other alternatives**

If you wanted to test alternative approaches, here are a few examples:

* Using `indexOf()` instead of `includes()`: This method returns the index of the first occurrence of the specified value, or -1 if not found.
* Using `in` operator: This operator checks if a property is present in an object.
* Using `hasOwnProperty()` to check for existence in an object's own properties.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and may not be as efficient as the original approaches used in this benchmark.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 126 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
array.includes	25362622.0 Ops/sec
obj[key]	24070768.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

array includes vs object key -1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: array.includes vs obj[key]

Created: 3 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

array.includes

obj[key]

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):