var obj = (new Array(1000)).fill(null).reduce((prev, newVal) => {prev[Math.random() + ''] = Math.random() + ''; return prev; }, { sausage: 'tst' });
var array = Object.keys(obj);
array.includes('sausage')
obj['sausage']
'sausage' in obj
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Includes | |
Object[key] | |
key in object |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Includes | 24889806.0 Ops/sec |
Object[key] | 23664464.0 Ops/sec |
key in object | 23021070.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares the performance of three different approaches:
includes
method to check if an element exists in an array.obj['sausage']
) and comparing it to the value 'sausage'
.in
operator to check if a key exists in an object.Options compared:
in
operator)Pros and Cons of each approach:
in
operator):Library usage:
In the provided JSON, the Object.keys()
method is used to create an array of property names from the obj
object. This is not a library per se but rather a built-in JavaScript method that returns an array of strings representing the property names in the specified object. However, it's worth noting that this approach assumes that all properties are enumerable and do not have any special characters.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The reduce()
method used to populate the obj
array with random values is a common JavaScript technique for creating arrays. The syntax var array = Object.keys(obj);
uses the spread operator (...
) and destructuring assignment (Object.keys(obj)
) features of modern JavaScript.
Other alternatives:
If you need more control over the iteration process or want to optimize performance, you can consider using:
Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the methods tested in this benchmark.