var testString = "testing,Newlines,Bleh"
var values = testString.split(",");
var value1 = values[0];
var value2 = values[1];
var value3 = values[2];
var regex = /.+((?=,)|$)/g
var value1 = regex[0];
var value2 = regex[1];
var value3 = regex[2];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Splitting29964 | |
Regex99 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Splitting29964 | 16885598.0 Ops/sec |
Regex99 | 52343048.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
What is tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases, each designed to measure the performance of different approaches for extracting values from a string.
Options compared:
There are two options being compared:
split()
method with a comma (,
) as the separator to split the input string into an array of values./.+((?=,)|$)/g
) to extract values from the input string.Pros and Cons:
Library usage:
In the provided benchmark code, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines (e.g., V8) have built-in support for regular expression optimizations, which might affect performance.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are a few notable features and syntax elements used in this benchmark:
\
): Used to create string literals with embedded expressions.=>
): Used as shorthand for function declarations (not explicitly shown, but implied by the Benchmark Definition
).Other alternatives:
Alternative approaches to extracting values from a string could include:
map()
, filter()
)indexOf()
, substr()
).match()
instead of .exec()
)Keep in mind that each approach has its trade-offs, and the choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.
I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions or need clarification on any of these points.