var string = 'salut comment ca va moi test pa adsk ldsj dkjasb kdaj akdajkda dkna dlkas mas '
var res = string.split(/\btest\b/)
var res = string.split('test')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Split by regex | |
Split by string |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Split by regex | 21049892.0 Ops/sec |
Split by string | 57239808.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its options.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, specifically measuring the performance of string splitting using two different approaches: regular expressions (regex) and plain string slicing. The test uses a predefined string variable string
that contains a long sequence of characters with the substring "test" embedded within it.
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of two options:
split()
method with a regular expression to split the input string into substrings.split()
method without any arguments, relying on the default behavior to split the string at whitespace characters (spaces and tabs) or use an empty separator.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of each option:
Library
In this benchmark, no specific library is required or used beyond the built-in JavaScript split()
method. However, in general, libraries like RegEx (e.g., regex.js
) can be used to simplify regex syntax and provide more features.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
This benchmark uses the var
keyword for variable declaration, which was a common practice in early versions of JavaScript. Modern JavaScript recommends using let
or const
instead, as they offer better scoping and binding behavior.
In summary, this benchmark allows users to compare the performance of two string splitting approaches: one using regular expressions and another relying on whitespace characters. The choice between these options depends on the specific use case and performance requirements.
Other Alternatives
If you need more advanced or specialized string splitting capabilities, consider using:
RegExp
constructor to achieve more complex splitting scenarios.Keep in mind that for most use cases, the built-in split()
method or simple string slicing should suffice. However, if you need more advanced features or customization options, consider using one of these alternatives.