var list = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000 * 1000; i++) {
list.push(i);
}
list = [list.slice(0, 500), 9999, list.slice(500)];
const newList = list;
newList.splice(500, 0, 9999);
list = newList;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
splice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 85.4 Ops/sec |
splice | 1491.2 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the JavaScript microbenchmark you've provided.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of two different approaches for inserting an element into an array in JavaScript:
Array.prototype.slice()
Array.prototype.splice()
with a new array created from slicing and concatenatingOptions Compared
In this benchmark, we have two options being compared:
slice
)splice
)The slice method involves creating a new array by taking a subset of the original array using Array.prototype.slice()
, and then inserting the element at the desired position. The splice method, on the other hand, modifies the original array in-place without creating a new one.
Pros and Cons
Slice Method (Option 1)
Pros:
Cons:
Splice Method (Option 2)
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Special JS Feature
In this benchmark, none of the test cases use any external libraries or special JavaScript features. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of the two methods.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other alternatives, here are a few options:
Array.prototype.slice()
with the reverse()
method to insert an element at the beginning of the array.Array.prototype.concat()
to concatenate two arrays and then inserting the element into the resulting array.Array.prototype.push()
or Array.prototype.unshift()
to append or prepend elements to the end or beginning of the array, respectively.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide a direct comparison to the slice and splice methods, but can be interesting variations on the theme.