Benchmark: jquery text vs js textContent

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Script Preparation code:

var d = "<p>test</p>";

Tests:

jquery text
$('#foo').text(d)
js innerHtml
document.getElementById('foo').textContent =d;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
jquery text
js innerHtml

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**What's being tested?**

The two test cases are comparing the performance of two approaches to get the text content of an HTML element: using jQuery's `text()` method versus directly accessing the `textContent` property on the DOM element.

**Options compared**

1. **jQuery's `text()` method**: This method sets the text content of an element and returns the current value.
2. **Directly accessing `textContent` property**: This property returns the text content of an element without modifying it.

**Pros and Cons**

* jQuery's `text()` method:
	+ Pros: Simple to use, provides a convenient way to set and get text content.
	+ Cons: Requires an additional library (jQuery) to be loaded, which can introduce extra overhead.
* Directly accessing `textContent` property:
	+ Pros: No extra libraries required, direct access to the DOM property.
	+ Cons: May require more code to use, as it's not a built-in method.

**Library and its purpose**

In this case, jQuery is being used for its convenience and ease of use. The `text()` method provides a simple way to set and get text content, which can be beneficial in many scenarios.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested here. Both approaches are standard DOM manipulation techniques.

**Other alternatives**

If you wanted to test other approaches, some possible alternatives could include:

* Using `innerHTML` property (although this is generally discouraged due to security concerns)
* Using a library like Moment.js for text formatting
* Implementing custom text content logic using JavaScript

For the provided benchmark, the two test cases are designed to compare the performance of jQuery's `text()` method versus directly accessing the `textContent` property. By measuring the execution time of each approach, the benchmark aims to determine which one is faster and more efficient.

The latest benchmark result shows that, for this specific use case, using jQuery's `text()` method yields a slightly better performance compared to directly accessing the `textContent` property on the DOM element.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 17_4_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.4.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 17 on iOS 17.4.1

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
jquery text	2730921.5 Ops/sec
js innerHtml	5489693.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

jquery text vs js textContent (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: jquery text vs js innerHtml

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

jquery text

js innerHtml

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):