Benchmark: const vs let vs var asd

Tests:

var
var g = { e: [] } g.o = function(x) { g.e.push(...[1,2,3]) } g.o()
let
let g = { e: [] } g.o = function(x) { g.e.push(...[1,2,3]) } g.o()
const
const g = { e: [] } g.o = function(x) { g.e.push(...[1,2,3]) } g.o()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
var
let
const

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks!

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test suite that compares the performance of three different variable declarations: `var`, `let`, and `const`. Each test case defines a script that creates an object `g` with an array property `e`, which is then populated with values using the `o()` function. The script is executed multiple times to measure the execution time.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares three options:

1. **Var**: The traditional JavaScript variable declaration using `var`.
2. **Let**: A newer JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015, which allows for block-scoped variables.
3. **Const**: Another newer feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015, which creates a constant variable that cannot be reassigned.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. **Var**:
	* Pros: Widely supported across older browsers and Node.js versions.
	* Cons: Can lead to "hoisting" issues, where variables are moved to the top of their scope, potentially causing unexpected behavior.
2. **Let**:
	* Pros: Block-scoped, which helps avoid hoisting issues, and is more explicit about variable scope.
	* Cons: May have slower performance compared to `var` due to additional overhead for block scoping.
3. **Const**:
	* Pros: Creates a constant variable that cannot be reassigned, making it easier to reason about code behavior.
	* Cons: Can lead to compilation errors if not used correctly, and may require additional type checking in some environments.

**Other considerations**

1. **Function scope**: The `o()` function is defined within the script block, which means its scope is tied to the block. This can affect how variables are treated by different browsers or versions.
2. **Execution order**: The order of execution for each variable declaration (e.g., `var`, `let`, and `const`) may differ depending on the browser or environment.

**Library usage**

None mentioned in the provided JSON, but it's worth noting that some benchmarks may use libraries like `benchmark.js` to manage test cases and execution. However, in this specific case, the benchmark seems to be a self-contained script.

**Special JS features or syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of different variable declarations.

Now that we've discussed the benchmark, let's take a look at some alternative approaches:

1. **Other variable declarations**: You might also want to test other variable declarations like `let const`, `const const`, or even more experimental features like `async/await`.
2. **Object creation and mutation**: Testing how different variables affect object creation and mutation could provide valuable insights into performance differences.
3. **Closure-based benchmarks**: Creating closures with different variable declarations (e.g., `var`, `let`, `const`) can help illustrate performance trade-offs between these options.

Keep in mind that the choice of benchmark test cases ultimately depends on your specific goals and requirements. Feel free to modify or extend this example to suit your needs!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
var	6565784.0 Ops/sec
let	3366502.8 Ops/sec
const	3614505.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

const vs let vs var asd (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: var vs let vs const

Created: 7 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

var

let

const

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):