function case1() {
var el = 'test';
var arr = ['foo', 'bar'];
return el + arr.join(',');
}
function case2() {
var el = 'test';
var arr = ['foo', 'bar'];
arr.unshift(el);
return arr.join(',');
}
case1()
case2()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string concat + join | |
unshift + join |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string concat + join | 10527602.0 Ops/sec |
unshift + join | 5708046.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the provided benchmark and its options.
Benchmark Overview
The given benchmark is for comparing two JavaScript methods: concatenating strings using the +
operator followed by joining an array with a comma separator, and pushing an element onto an array and then joining it. The benchmark aims to determine which approach is faster in terms of executions per second.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code defines two functions:
case1()
: Concatenates the string 'test'
with an array arr
containing elements 'foo'
and 'bar'
, using the +
operator followed by joining the array elements with a comma separator.case2()
: Pushes the string 'test'
onto the same array arr
, and then joins its elements with a comma separator.Options Compared
The benchmark compares two options:
+
operator to concatenate strings, followed by joining an array using the join()
method.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library Used
None is explicitly mentioned in the provided code.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The benchmark uses JavaScript's built-in join()
method and array operations (pushing elements onto an array). No special features or syntax are used beyond standard JavaScript.
Other Considerations
When evaluating these approaches, consider the following:
Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or variations of these methods, consider the following:
StringBuilder
-like libraries (e.g., string-pool
) to optimize string concatenationArray.prototype.reduce()
or Array.prototype.forEach()
, for joining arrays.